Letters / Inappropriate for a Geopark
I write in response to James Sandison’s letter (Mankind makes CO2; SN, 21/10/2018).
If Mr Sandison’s wish is to offset Shetland’s carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions there’s no need to install giant wind farms, supplying 15 times Shetland’s maximum electricity demand. That would be pointless overkill, entailing vast, unnecessary, environmental devastation. Much smaller, less intrusive developments could erase Shetland’s “carbon footprint” at far lower cost to Britain’s electricity consumers.
The motivation for SSE’s 600MW subsea cable to Scotland is money, pure and simple. They, Viking Energy (VE), Shetland Charitable Trust (SCT) et al, are ‘subsidy vultures’, preying on the carrion of government’s decision compelling utilities to buy uneconomic renewable energy, subsidised by consumers’ and leading inexorably to ever rising energy bills and fuel poverty.
True wealth, however, encompasses the quality of our overall lifestyle, including the environment in which we live, not merely how much money we have in the bank.
For example, Shetlanders are fortunate to live in a “UNESCO Global Geopark”. “What’s that?” I hear some say:
“UNESCO Global Geoparks are….. geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development.”
“The Shetland landscape of today is home to an amazing biodiversity. Over one million seabirds inhabit the cliffs and moorland, with 70 different bird species… and over 430 migratory species recorded. As well as large colonies of puffins and gannets the islands are home to fifty percent of the world population of the globally rare Great Skua.”
“Where else can you walk on ancient oceanic crust, explore an extinct volcano and stroll across shifting sands all in a day?”
The installation of SSE’s proposed 600MW subsea cable between Shetland and Scotland will result in construction of 150 to 200 birling monsters, each of whose 60m blades will scythe through 3 acres of sky and reach over 500ft above the 3-acre, flattened hilltop sites on which each turbine sits.
Sites that were hitherto valuable “peat carbon sinks” would now release their stored CO2 to atmosphere. Ditto for the many tens of miles of new roads through peat wilderness, sufficiently sturdy to support the colossal structures that would be transported over them.
No need to labour the point, it’s obvious. The conversion of ancient wilderness to industrial wind farms, from Gulberwick to Gloup, would disfigure and devastate the landscape and would be completely inappropriate in the Shetland UNESCO Global Geopark.
John Tulloch
Lyndon
Arrochar
Become a supporter of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider start paying for their dose of the latest local news delivered straight to their PC, tablet or mobile phone.
Journalism comes at a price and because that price is not being paid in today’s rapidly changing media world, most publishers - national and local - struggle financially despite very healthy audience figures.
Most online publishers have started charging for access to their websites, others have chosen a different route. Shetland News currently has over 600 supporters who are all making small voluntary financial contributions. All funds go towards covering our cost and improving the service further.
Your contribution will ensure Shetland News can: -
- Bring you the headlines as they happen;
- Stay editorially independent;
- Give a voice to the community;
- Grow site traffic further;
- Research and publish more in-depth news, including more Shetland Lives features.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a supporter of Shetland News by either making a single payment or monthly subscription.
Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.
Already a supporter? Sign in to hide this message.
