widget/exchange-29
widget/exchange-30widget/exchange-33
widget/exchange-31
Letters /

What price health and property?

An open letter to all Shetland Island councillors

Dear councillor,

Every week more and more evidence emerges from UK and worldwide sources on the adverse health effects to those living close to industrial wind farms such as the planned Viking Energy wind farm.This wind farm project is part-owned and part-funded by Shetland Charitable Trust and supported by Shetland Islands Council.

In 2009 The World Health Organisation’s report ‘Night Noise Guidelines for Europe’ identified environmental noise as a major public health issue. Since then a whole body of evidence has grown to support this and other report’s findings.

In 2013, a study into the likely health impact on residents living within the planned Viking Energy wind farm was carried out by NHS Shetland’s director of public health Dr Sarah Taylor.

She concluded “Wind turbines are known to cause a number of effects that have an impact on health”.

offset-carousel/post-mobile/0

Although commissioned by them, Shetland Charitable Trust noted and then binned her report, citing their failure to publish a Health Impact Assessment before planning consent as the reason for not being able to act on this report.

In April this year Professor Emeritus Alun Evans (Visiting Senior Research Fellow, Centre for Public Health, The Queen’s University of Belfast) has published a short paper entitled ‘Wind Farms and Health’.

In this he concludes “there are serious adverse health effects associated with noise pollution generated by wind turbines. It is essential that separation distances between human habitation and wind turbines are increased. There is an international consensus emerging for a separation distance of 2 km, indeed some countries are opting for 3 km. The current guideline on separation distance is based on ETSU-R-97 and is manifestly out of date. It is only relevant to the small turbines of that era. The vastly increased scale of today’s turbines means that the current recommendation on turbine separation is grossly inadequate.”

Shetland News — free to read

Membership helps pay for journalism

If you value impartial local journalism, become a member of Shetland News and get:

  • Only local ads.
  • Members' weekly newsletter.
  • Bookmark stories and join the comments.
 

Over 70 of the 103 Viking Energy industrial sized turbines will be within the 2 km separation distance of dwellings where people living in them will have their health adversely affected.

The Government guidelines on minimum distance from dwellings at the time of submission of the Viking planning application was 2 km and these guidelines were ignored by councillors. Much of the Viking wind farm will be built on land owned by Shetland Islands Council.

Shetland Charitable Trust has ignored Dr Taylor’s Health Impact Assessment and Shetland Islands Council have also failed to take any action to protect the health of residents within the 2 km zone.

It is not just on health issues that evidence against building of wind farms close to dwellings is stacking up. A recent independent report by the London School of Economics is Gone with the Wind: Valuing the Visual Impacts of Wind Turbines through House Prices.

offset-carousel/post-mobile/1

This report concludes “All the results point in the same direction. Wind farms reduce house prices in postcodes where the turbines are visible, and reduce prices relative to postcodes close to wind farms where the wind farms are not visible.”

I’m one of the lucky ones in that my house is not within the Viking Wind farm 2 km zone but may well be within 2 km of another industrial sized wind farm, which will need to be built to make any interconnector cable viable.

It would not surprise me if, like Shetland Charitable Trust, most councillors continue to ignore the growing evidence on health and house prices. Perhaps they should take note of the many past construction practices that were formerly considered safe, such as using blue asbestos in buildings, that have come back to bite developers.

offset-carousel/post-mobile/2

Perhaps councillors should be aware of advice recently published by the housing and homelessness charity Shelter Scotland on how to serve a ‘Blight Notice’ against a council or other public authority.

A Blight Notice can be served if a planned public development, including wind farms by utility companies, affects the value of a home and is known as ‘planning blight’. If I lived within the Viking wind farm that stretches across central Mainland I would be getting my house valued now to obtain a benchmark house price to underpin my claim.

Allen Fraser
Meal
Hamnavoe
Burra

Shetland News — free to read

Membership helps pay for journalism

If you value impartial local journalism, become a member of Shetland News and get:

  • Only local ads.
  • Members' weekly newsletter.
  • Bookmark stories and join the comments.
 
Categories
widget/exchange-62widget/newsletter_form_widget-3widget/exchange-64widget/pd_widget-6widget/exchange-63widget/exchange-54widget/pd_widget-8widget/exchange-55widget/pd_widget-9widget/exchange-56

JavaScript Required

We're sorry, but Shetland News isn't fully functional without JavaScript enabled.
Head over to the help page for instructions on how to enable JavaScript on your browser.

Interested in Notifications?

Get notifications from Shetland News for important and breaking news.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

Interested in Notifications?

You can install the Shetland News app on your device, simply tap and then 'Add to Home Screen'.

Loading the app will allow you to accept notifications.

Shetland News — free to read

  • Only local ads.
  • Members' weekly newsletter.
  • Bookmark stories and join the comments.