The Bop Shop - Boppapalooza - 24 May 2025
Monday 19 May 2025
 10.1°C   NNE Moderate Breeze
Ocean Kinetics - The Engineering Experts

Letters / Norway never gave away Shetland

They say Norway gave Shetland away. That’s the story we’ve been fed for generations — but it’s not just wrong, it’s a historical lie. The truth is written in black and white, buried in legal documents that Scotland hoped we’d forget — and it tells a very different story.

In 1468 and 1469, the islands of Orkney and Shetland were pawned by King Christian I of Denmark-Norway to King James III of Scotland, as a temporary guarantee for a dowry payment. This was a pledge — not a sale, not a gift, not a handover. The original charters (dated 28 May 1469, from Havn/Copenhagen) explicitly state that the islands were pledged “under assured security” and were to remain under Scottish control until the dowry was repaid — nothing more.

“We have granted, pledged and mortgaged, and under assured security and pledge do grant, mortgage and pledge all and sundry our lands of the islands of Shetland…” (Christian I’s Pawning Documents, Shetland Museum) 

But what’s often missed is this: Christian I was pawning the Crown’s lands — not the private lands held by Shetlanders under Udal law. In Shetland, land wasn’t the king’s to give away. Under our Norse legal tradition, land was inherited allodially, passed from parent to child — not owned by any monarch. So even if Christian had the right to pledge his own royal revenues, he had no right whatsoever to pawn Shetlanders’ ancestral lands. Yet that’s exactly what Scotland seized.

And there’s an even deeper problem — one that destroys the entire myth at its root.

How could Norway have given us away, when Norway wasn’t even consulted? At the time, Denmark and Norway were united under Christian I, but Shetland was a dependency of the Kingdom of Norway — not Denmark. Under the 1450 Treaty of Bergen, Norway remained a self-governing kingdom, with decisions over its territory requiring the consent of its Council of the Realm. But Norway was completely bypassed. The pawning was done without Norwegian approval — and that makes the entire deal unconstitutional and illegitimate under the laws in place at the time.

Christian I never relinquished Norway’s sovereign right to reclaim the islands. He and his successors attempted to repay the dowry multiple times — in 1549, 1550, 1558, 1585, 1589, 1640, and 1660 — and each time, the Scots refused the money. Not only that — they refused to even negotiate. Scotland’s takeover wasn’t legal. It was deliberate, opportunistic, and exploitative.

And it wasn’t just Denmark-Norway that understood this. Scotland knew it too. In 1514, the Duke of Albany, acting as Regent of Scotland, offered to return Shetland and Orkney to Denmark in exchange for military support. A decade later, in 1524, he again proposed returning Orkney for financial aid. These weren’t symbolic gestures — they were serious political negotiations, and they prove something devastating to the Scottish claim: even Scotland’s own leadership knew their possession of Shetland was conditional — and could be undone.

And who suffered the consequences? We did. The Shetlanders. 

Under Norse rule, we had Udal law — a fair and ancient legal system built on allodial land rights. We had Norse customs, Norse names, and our own Norse language — Norn. It should never have been dismantled. But under Scottish rule, that’s exactly what happened. What followed wasn’t assimilation — it was Scottification and colonisation. 

Our Udal law was stripped from us.
Our native tongue, Norn, was systematically eradicated and mocked — ridiculed in public, excluded from schools, and buried so deep that many Shetlanders have never even heard of it. Does that not tell you something?Our Norse naming traditions were wiped out. Parents weren’t allowed to give their children Norse or so-called heathen names, the patronymic system was stamped out, and surnames were changed to fit Scottish norms — erasing centuries of heritage in the process.

The Scots didn’t honour the conditions of the agreement. They abolished our laws, replaced our language, and erased our culture.

“The islands continued to follow Norse Law and were connected to the Law Book of Magnus the Lawmender until 1611 when an act of parliament abolished its use and ordered the islands to follow Scottish law.“ (“The Norse influence on Shetland culture” on Shetland.org)

The claim that Shetland is rightfully Scottish doesn’t just fall apart — it shatters. There is no treaty of cession, no formal agreement extinguishing Norway’s rights, and no legal justification for the annexation of Shetland in 1472. The original documents still exist. The facts are still visible. We were not given away. We were taken. 

And the consequences didn’t stop in the past. The illegitimate way Shetland was absorbed into Scotland — without consent, without a treaty, and without legal resolution — laid the foundation for what we still face today. Shetlanders are politically voiceless in decisions about our own islands. The past defines the present. The erosion of our sovereignty began in 1469 — but its impact reaches into every corner of our lives today.

Perhaps our future lies in our past?

Shetlanders deserve to know the truth — for ourselves, for those who lost everything, and for those who’ll come after us.
They deserve to grow up knowing our real history — not lies that suit Scotland’s weak claim to our isles.

Magnus Hutchison
Whalsay


Sources:

  • Charter of Christian I, 1469, in Saga-Book of the Viking Society, Vol. 17 (1907–08), pp. 175–176
  • Smith, Brian. The Shetland Documents 1195–1579, Shetland Archives
  • Donaldson, Gordon. The Scottish Historical Review, Vol. 42 (1963)
  • Thomson, William P. L. The New History of Orkney (2001)
  • Marwick, Hugh. The Orkney Norn (1929)
  • Goudie, Gilbert. The Celtic and Scandinavian Antiquities of Shetland (1904)
  • Shetland Museum & Archives Blog: “550 Years Ago: How Shetland Became Part of Scotland”
  • National Archives of Norway: Letters of King Christian II
  • Krag, Claus. Norsk Historie 800–1300 (Aschehoug, 2000)
  • Helle, Knut. The Cambridge History of Scandinavia, Vol. 1 (2003)
  • Seenan, Gerard. “The pawn status of the islands is still valid”, The Guardian, 20 February 2002 https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/feb/20/gerardseenan
  • “The Norse influence on Shetland culture” on Shetland.org
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 
Advertisement 

Newsletters

Subscribe to a selection of different newsletters from Shetland News, varying from breaking news delivered on the minute, to a weekly round-up of the opinion posts. All delivered straight to your inbox.

Daily Briefing Newsletter Weekly Highlights Newsletter Opinion Newsletter Life in Shetland Newsletter

JavaScript Required

We're sorry, but Shetland News isn't fully functional without JavaScript enabled.
Head over to the help page for instructions on how to enable JavaScript on your browser.

Your Privacy

We use cookies on our site to improve your experience.
By using our service, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Browser is out-of-date

Shetland News isn't fully functional with this version of .
Head over to the help page for instructions on updating your browser for more security, improved speed and the best overall experience on this site.

Interested in Notifications?

Get notifications from Shetland News for important and breaking news.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

Audience Survey for Shetland News

Tell us what you think and win £100!

This survey is run by a UK charity, the Public Interest News Foundation. We exist to support independent news providers.

Your answers will power important research. We will share aggregated and anonymous answers with your news provider. And we will produce an overarching UK-wide report, which will be available on our website.

To enter the £100 prize draw, complete the survey and enter your email at the end.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Have you considered becoming a member of Shetland News?

If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please consider paying for membership and get the following features and services: -

  • Remove non-local ads;
  • Bookmark posts to read later;
  • Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
  • Hide membership messages;
  • Comments open for discussion.