Letters / Irrelevant to my point
John, yes, I did read your letter but dismissed it as being irrelevant to my point. (Geordie, you didn’t read my letter, SN 30 April 2012)
I don’t have to make an argument based on a “premiss” (sic), false or otherwise. I only have to point out the facts as they stand. It is for Sustainable Shetland to put forward an alternative to the Viking Wind Farm which they have singularly failed to do.
My standpoint offers the prospect of diversifying industry in Shetland as against Sustainable Shetland’s status quo of declining indigenous industry and lack of prospect for future generations.
So, I don’t have to research into “Resurging North American Oil Production et al ” or look at “thorium nuclear reactors ..readily scaleable” or otherwise. I’ll leave that to techno-phobes and climate change deniers.
Regards,
Geordie Pottinger
Hamnavoe
Burra
Become a member of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its readers to consider paying for membership to get additional perks:
- Removal of third-party ads;
- Bookmark posts to read later;
- Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
- Hide membership messages;
- Comments open for discussion.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a member of Shetland News by either making a single payment, or setting up a monthly, quarterly or yearly subscription.
Already a member? Sign in to hide this message.
