Ocean Kinetics - The Engineering Experts

Council / Councillor Scott ‘relieved’ after ethical standards commissioner dismisses complaints against him

Councillor Ian Scott. Photo: Chris Cope/Shetland News

ALLEGATIONS that a Shetland councillor had accused council officials of lying have been dismissed following an investigation by the Ethical Standards Commissioner.

Shetland Central councillor Ian Scott was reported to the watchdog by council convener Malcolm Bell and leader Steven Coutts following a verbal clash in the council chamber on 9 September last year.

Scott was also accused of shouting in the council chamber, continually talking over the chair of the meeting and making further allegations against council officials.

Following a four month investigation, these allegations have been thrown out by the investigating officer.

Scott described the period of investigation against him as a “worry” and said he felt “relieved” by the commissioner’s decision. As a consequence of the investigation Scott had resigned as chair of the licensing committee and board, as well as a member of the policy and resources committee.

“I always had faith in the trusty sword of free speech and the sturdy shield of truth to carry the day,” he added.

The dispute stems from remarks by Scott during a debate around a petition lodged by concerned islanders who questioned the SIC’s governance structures and in particular the extent of delegated powers used by council officials which, they said, left councillors regularly in the dark of what is going on in the local authority.

Speaking in support of a motion by vice-convener Cecil Smith to investigate the content of the petition a little further, Scott told the meeting of the full council that, at times, information he had received from council official had been “far from satisfactory” and on one occasion turned out to be a “lie”.

During his contribution Scott was interrupted several times by the meeting’s chair, convener Malcolm Bell, reprimanding him for allegedly accusing council officials of lying.

This was vehemently disputed by the Shetland central member, who was then ordered by the convener to switch off his microphone.

The exchange can again be witnessed in this clip taken from the council’s YouTube channel:

On Tuesday, Scott told Shetland News that he was delighted to be able to continue representing the people of the Shetland central ward.

“Many constituents have asked me if I feel I have been bullied, threatened or intimidated over the issue, but I just thanked them for their concern and said that I am a big boy now,” Scott said.

“Due to the confidential nature of the complaint, I can’t say too much about the detail, but I will say I was particularly offended by being accused of swearing in the council chamber on the 9 September 2020.

“This has been shown to be completely and utterly untrue, but whether or not there is a forthcoming apology, only time will tell. My poor old mother would have been horrified to hear that her son had sworn in such esteemed surroundings.

“All in all then, I am relieved that the issue has been resolved and this allows me to continue to strive against our neo-liberal politicians and their cuts in our public services.”

Responding to the ethical standards’ commissioner’s decision, Bell said that as council convener he will continue “to uphold the constitution and standing orders of the council”.

SIC convener Malcolm BellSIC convener Malcolm Bell.

He added that “no apology” to Ian Scott was required, adding that he stood by his decision to refer the councillor to the Ethical Standards Commissioner.

“Councillor Scott, on at least two occasions, made serious allegations in public about an unnamed member of council staff – once in the council chamber and later on BBC Radio Shetland where the allegations were repeated.

“He stated that he had been told ‘what turned out to be a lie’ by a member of staff. These recordings are in the public domain so people can hear for themselves what was said.

“The Councillors Code of Conduct is absolutely clear and explicit that councillors must not call into question the conduct or capability of members of staff in public.

“If a member does have a genuine concern about staff conduct then these should be dealt with through the member / officer protocol which all councillors are aware of and have received training on.

“Making an unsubstantiated allegation of lying against an unidentified member of staff effectively puts all of our 3,000 or so employees under suspicion. That is unacceptable, unfair and in those circumstances it was absolutely appropriate, after giving Councillor Scott a final opportunity to raise his concerns under our protocol, to refer the matter to the Ethical Standards Commissioner.

“Of course, what is equally concerning is that if the allegations do indeed have substance, our Chief Executive has not been given the opportunity to deal with them.”

The Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland has meantime confirmed that the complaint against Ian Scott had been dismissed.

The organisation oversees the conduct of those holding public office. The body is also tasked to encourage transparency in public life in Scotland.

The watchdog can investigate complaints against MSPs, local authority councillors or board members of public bodies. It also looks into how people are appointed to the boards of regulated public bodies.

Last month, following an investigation by the Ethical Standards Commissioner, North Isles councillor Ryan Thomson was censured by the Standards Commission for failing to update his register of interests.

The full council meeting of 9 September last year, which decided against looking into any of the issues raised by three petitions from constituents, can be watched again at this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMIaGe1REuw

Council ‘notes’ petitions with no further debate

Categories
Scottish Parliament election, 6 May 2021