THE CHANCES of a historic waterfront Lerwick lodberry being turned into a home appear to be increasingly slim after the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) reiterated its concern over flooding despite new efforts to mitigate the risk.
Aidan and Tracey Mills, who live in Canada, are keen to turn the former Lerwick Sea Scouts base on Commercial Street – which was built around 1817 – into a home.
SEPA previously objected in principle to the idea over the apparent risk of coastal flooding, and it has now repeated its concerns – leading to Shetland Islands Council planners to suggest the application will likely be recommended for refusal.
A risk assessment previously carried out by engineers Arch Henderson showed that the B-listed building has been susceptible to flooding in the past.
“With tide levels predicted to rise, so will the risk and frequency of flooding,” Arch Henderson’s Karl Tait said.
The lodberry – which was owned by Shetland Islands Council – had been leased to the sea scouts from the 1970s to 2016, but it has been dormant since then, with the inside of the building in poor condition.
Modifications to the plans were submitted in December in an attempt to mitigate the flood risk, including a proposal to extend the existing sea wall along the edge of the building’s pier.
The main kitchen has also been relocated from the ground floor to the first floor, which is above likely flood levels, following concern from SEPA.
There are also plans to install a storm gate for use in poor weather, and fix a new 1,100mm high balustrade railing between the stone wall and the building.
Colin Sim of Malcolmson Architects wrote to Shetland Islands Council planners regarding SEPA’s view that there would be potential increased vulnerability if the building was made into a house, saying that it had originally been a dwelling before the Sea Scouts took it on.
While he admitted there are a “number of technical difficulties to overcome to improve the resilience of the building”, Sim said that it is not uncommon for technical solutions to be fully resolved and submitted at the planning stage.
SEPA, however, said it maintained its objection in principle to the application over the “serious flood risk” the building could be placed under.
The government agency recommended alternative sites be considered as it believes that due to the lodberry’s location the project would not meet Scottish planning policy.
Shetland Islands Council’s planning service wrote to the applicant after SEPA’s submission to suggest the likely next steps would be either for the application to be recommended for refusal, or that it is withdrawn.
The planning service had earlier confirmed that an application would need to be submitted to change the use of the property to a dwelling.
Become a supporter of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider start paying for their dose of the latest local news delivered straight to their PC, tablet or mobile phone.
Journalism comes at a price and because that price is not being paid in today’s rapidly changing media world, most publishers - national and local - struggle financially despite very healthy audience figures.
Most online publishers have started charging for access to their websites, others have chosen a different route. Shetland News currently has over 350 supporters who are all making small voluntary financial contributions. All funds go towards covering our cost and improving the service further.
Your contribution will ensure Shetland News can: -
- Bring you the headlines as they happen;
- Stay editorially independent;
- Give a voice to the community;
- Grow site traffic further;
- Research and publish more in-depth news, including more Shetland Lives features.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a supporter of Shetland News by either making a single payment or by monthly subscription.
Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.Support Shetland News