I see from your article Ofgem blocks new power station plans (SN 25/4/14 ) that the good officers of Ofgem – sitting on their backsides in London – have seen fit to interfere in the management of Shetland’s electricity generation system, claiming that the proposed new power plant fails to provide the most efficient, economic possible solution, adding gravely that it is essential to minimise the cost of subsidy to mainland consumers.
This seems, on the surface, to be an extraordinary piece of bad judgement on Ofgem’s part – so much so that one wonders what motivated them to say this publicly?
In their last breath, they were assenting to mainland consumers footing the bill for 350MW of wind energy from Shetland at £115/MWh, almost three times the price of coal-generated electricity and more than twice the price of gas, not to mention the cost of a billion pound submarine cable which would have to be paid for by some combination of consumers and taxpayers.
And now, in their next breath, Ofgem are saying that a Shetland power station generating electricity from gas isn’t the best option for poor, cash-strapped mainland consumers?
Well, I’ve got news for you, boys. I’m one of those mainland consumers about whose finances you are so concerned and I say, give me the gas power station in Shetland, any day.
Let’s run this past ourselves one more time:
1. Gas by pipeline, direct from Total, Sullom Voe, straight from the sea bed, isn’t economic when the EU is importing its gas by pipeline thousands of miles from Siberia?
2. Gas from Sullom Voe, to be used to generate electricity, in a state of the art gas power station, isn’t economic?
Pull the other one, boys, it’s got ‘bells on it’!
Ofgem, with your hand on your heart, are you sure this has nothing to do with the Scottish independence referendum and which particular set of fools ultimately parts company with their – or, rather, other people’s – hard-earned money by forking out for the islands’ submarine cables?
Of course, it would be easy to make this Shetland Project more economic still, you could always tell them to forget about wind turbines and batteries and extend the gas main into Lerwick and Scalloway, so reducing demand for electricity and hence, the amount of subsidy required to be paid by mainland consumers?
Become a supporter of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider start paying for their dose of the latest local news delivered straight to their PC, tablet or mobile phone.
Journalism comes at a price and because that price is not being paid in today’s rapidly changing media world, most publishers - national and local - struggle financially despite very healthy audience figures.
Most online publishers have started charging for access to their websites, others have chosen a different route. Shetland News currently has over 440 supporters who are all making small voluntary financial contributions. All funds go towards covering our cost and improving the service further.
Your contribution will ensure Shetland News can: -
- Bring you the headlines as they happen;
- Stay editorially independent;
- Give a voice to the community;
- Grow site traffic further;
- Research and publish more in-depth news, including more Shetland Lives features.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a supporter of Shetland News by either making a single payment or monthly subscription.
Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.Support Shetland News