Sunday 14 July 2024
 11.9°C   NNE Fresh Breeze
Ocean Kinetics - The Engineering Experts

News / SIC planners in favour of Yell wind farm

How the Beaw Field wind farm turbines could look from Burravoe. Image courtesy of Peel Energy.

SHETLAND Islands Council’s planning department is recommending that consent should be given for a 17-turbine wind farm in the south east of Yell.

Because of the Beaw Field project’s size – it will have a generating capacity exceeding 50MW – it is classed as a “major development”, meaning the decision will ultimately be taken by the Scottish Government’s energy consents unit.

The SIC is a statutory consultee as the local planning authority. The deadline for a response is 5 October, with the planning board meeting on Tuesday (27 September) to discuss the plans, which were submitted by Peel Wind Farms (Yell) Ltd.

Beaw Field wind farm would be built over an area of 1,135 hectares in Burravoe, in the south of Yell, with the construction phase expected to last around two years.

The whole project hinges on a subsea interconnector cable being laid to connect Shetland to the UK power grid.

That would enable the Yell project and Viking Energy’s 103-turbine wind farm on the Shetland mainland to proceed – but, with the Tory government slashing subsidies for onshore wind, it is far from clear whether the cable will get the go-ahead.

Manchester-based Peel Energy took over the project when German developers Enertrag pulled out in 2014 

There is strong support within the Yell community, with Peel Energy’s Bernadette Barry last year saying people “seem to be very much in favour of the project”.


The 17 turbines would have a maximum height of 145 metres and a network of 11km of access tracks would be required. Other associated infrastructure includes several watercourse crossings, an electrical substation, underground cabling, borrow pits and a 20m-high radio communications tower. 

A report from planning officer Amy Melkevik states the developer’s wish to “make a positive contribution to the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources” and in doing so help combat climate change.

Become a supporter of Shetland News


The developer looked at various layouts before settling on this proposal, enabling it to “accommodate exclusion zones for birds, habitats, the operation of Scatsta Airport, a scheduled ancient monument [Gossabrough Broch], dwelling houses and communication links”, the report states.

No objections have been made on the grounds of visual impact, although the council has not publicised the application since the consent process is being handled by the government’s energy consents unit.

To mitigate the potential for shadow flicker at nearby properties, the developer says it will shut down certain turbines when flicker is most likely to be created.

The RSPB is maintaining its objection on the grounds that measures to safeguard protected bird species “are not sufficient to mitigate all risk to these internationally important species”.

But Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), the statutory consultee, has removed its objection, as it believes the mitigation measures “sufficiently address any issues regarding bird species”.

SEPA originally objected, citing a lack of information about the reuse and management of peat on the site, but subsequently withdrew its objection.

As previously reported, Scatsta Airport and oil company BP are objecting because of the potential operational impact on the airport. But the applicant points out that the development is outwith Scatsta’s own safeguarding area, and says it will not affect radar or flight procedures.

Delting Community Council has highlighted the visual impact for those living in Mossbank, and is asking whether residents there would get any part of the promised community benefit payments. Peel Energy last year estimated those payments would be worth £375,000 a year to the Yell community.

Shetland Biological Records Centre is not objecting, saying it is “encouraged” by plans to restore some of the habitat to blanket bog.

However, it says the quality of blanket bog within the site is “underplayed”, and suggests a “realistic” worst-case scenario for the project’s carbon payback has not been given.

Melkevik’s report concludes that the proposed development is compliant with the aims of the 2014 Shetland local development plan.

“It is considered that notwithstanding the objection from Scatsta Airport, BP and the RSPB, that the council should not raise objections to the proposal.

“This is because it is considered that the concerns raised by Scatsta Airport and BP can be addressed by condition.”

Become a supporter of Shetland News

Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider start paying for their dose of the latest local news delivered straight to their PC, tablet or mobile phone.

Journalism comes at a price and because that price is not being paid in today’s rapidly changing media world, most publishers - national and local - struggle financially despite very healthy audience figures.

Most online publishers have started charging for access to their websites, others have chosen a different route. Shetland News currently has  over 600 supporters  who are all making small voluntary financial contributions. All funds go towards covering our cost and improving the service further.

Your contribution will ensure Shetland News can: -

  • Bring you the headlines as they happen;
  • Stay editorially independent;
  • Give a voice to the community;
  • Grow site traffic further;
  • Research and publish more in-depth news, including more Shetland Lives features.

If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a supporter of Shetland News by either making a single payment or monthly subscription.

Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.



Subscribe to a selection of different newsletters from Shetland News, varying from breaking news delivered on the minute, to a weekly round-up of the opinion posts. All delivered straight to your inbox.

Daily Briefing Newsletter Weekly Highlights Newsletter Opinion Newsletter Life in Shetland Newsletter

JavaScript Required

We're sorry, but Shetland News isn't fully functional without JavaScript enabled.
Head over to the help page for instructions on how to enable JavaScript on your browser.

Your Privacy

We use cookies on our site to improve your experience.
By using our service, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Browser is out-of-date

Shetland News isn't fully functional with this version of .
Head over to the help page for instructions on updating your browser for more security, improved speed and the best overall experience on this site.

Interested in Notifications?

Get notifications from Shetland News for important and breaking news.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

Become a supporter of Shetland News

We're committed to ensuring everyone has equitable access to impartial, open and quality local journalism that benefits all residents.

By supporting Shetland News, you play a vital role in ensuring we remain a pivotal resource in supporting the community.

Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.